REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Divorce Cause 6 of 2006 JUDITH CHEPTOO ……………..……………… PETITIONER VERSUS KENNEDY KIPROP ………………………….. RESPONDENT RULING The Petition herein was signed by the Petitioner though the Petition is said to have been drawn and filed by M/s. Chepkwony & Co. Advocates. The Respondent has filed objection to the appearance or representation by counsel for the Petitioner on the ground that no Notice of Appointment has been filed. I have perused the Matrimonial Causes Act and Rules, and the same are silent as to whether a Petition must be signed by a Petitioner. In the Companies Act, Cap 486, a Petitioner in a Winding-Up Cause must sign the Petition under his own hand. This is specifically provided for. In the absence of any provision I hold that a Petition signed by the Petitioner must be deemed to be one filed by the Petitioner. It is the person or advocate who draws and filed the Petition that must sign. A process cannot be drawn and filed by an Advocate and then it is signed by the client or party unless there is provision to that effect. I therefore uphold the preliminary objection raised by Mr. Momanyi Counsel for the Respondent. The Petitioner is of course at liberty to instruct and retain an Advocate in the prosecution of the petition. Costs of the objection to the Respondent. DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON THIS 16TH MARCH, 2007. M. K. IBRAHIM JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.