REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU Civil Appeal 62 of 2004 RODAH GATWIRI ……......……..……………….APPELLANT VERSUS KATHURIMA MUGAMBI…………….………..RESPONDENT. (FROM ORIGINAL CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN MERU CIVIL CASE NO. 62 OF 2004) RULING The applicant herein is seeking leave to amend her plaint by deleting the year 2002 and substituting therewith 1st October 2003 as the date the defendant is alleged to have wrongfully entered the suit land. Secondly the proposed amendment seeks to plead a prayer for declaration that the suit land belongs to the plaintiff. Finally the applicant is seeking to specify the date from which her claim for mesne profit accrued. The application was argued exparte as there was neither a reply to it not attendance by the respondent or his counsel. Amendments to pleadings sought before the hearing should be freely allowed if the court is satisfied that no injustice shall be occasioned to the otherside and there will be injustice if the other side can be compensated by costs. The amendments sought cannot cause any injustice to the respondent. They are fairly straight forward, intended to clarify the plaintiff’s case. For these reasons the application dated 22nd December 2006 is allowed. It is ordered that leave to amend the plaint in terms of the draft annexed plaint is granted. That draft plaint shall be deemed duly signed and served. I make no orders as to costs. Dated and delivered at Meru this13TH day ofJULY,2007. W.OUKO JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.