Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2059 of 2007

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Criminal Case 72 of 2004 REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..PROSECUTOR VS MARTIN NYONGESA WEFWAFWA…………...……..……….ACCUSED RULING OF THE COURT Even as at the time the State Counsel is sitting down after his reply, he has not informed the court why there are no witnesses in court today. He, himself is on record as having requested for the last (final) adjournment on 24.1.2007, i.e 6 months ago. He has not told us why 6 months down the line not even a single witness is available. Justice must balance both sides of the scales. The accused person has been in custody for almost 3 years now. Last time, the State Counsel informed the court that the witnesses could not be traced. He has not told us what efforts have been made to trace them or what chances there are that they will be traced. The accused person cannot be detained in custody forever at the whims of the prosecution, more importantly, adjournments should not be granted as a matter of course even when it is evident that the police (I.O) are sleeping on their job and are not making any efforts to have the witnesses come to court. An accused person is presumed innocent until he is proven guilty. He also has an inalienable right to a fair and speedy trial. It is the duty of the court to ensure that those rights are not trampled upon by the state. My view is that the interests of justice demand that this matter should not be adjourned further. Indeed I have not been given any reasons why the same should be adjourned further. I realize that this is a very serious charge where a life was lost. This is the more reason why the prosecutor should have taken the matter more seriously and bonded the witnesses. My sense of justice demands that this wrongful incarnation of the accused person be brought to an end. Accordingly, the application for adjournment is hereby refused. The court is hereby discharges the accused person and directs that he should be set at liberty unless he is otherwise lawfully held. He should also not be charged with any offence on the same facts. These orders are made in accordance with the inherent power of this court as bestowed on me by section 60 of the Constitution of Kenya W. KARANJA JUDGE 24/7/2007 ORDER: Assessors be paid their allowance for today. W. KARANJA JUDGE

page 1 of 2

COURT: Ruling be typed. A certified copy thereof be supplied to the State Counsel, PCIO, Western Province and DCIO, Bungoma to note. They are put on notice that if they do not pull up their socks, such laxity will be met with similar measures.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.