REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Case 85 of 2004 GEOM HOLDINGS (K) LTD GEORGE WILLIAMS OMONDI GETRUDE ATIENO OMONDI..............................................................................................................APPLICANTS versus CO-OPERATIVE MERCHANT BANK LTD CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA...............................................................................................RESPONDENTS RULING. The Notice of Motion dated 28th September 2007 while seeking consent of this court to change advocates also contains other prayers in favour of applicant / plaintiffs. In as far as the prayer for leave seeking consent of the court to allow M/S OTIENO ARUM & CO Advocates or any other Advocates, come on record for the Plaintiffs in place of M/S WAGARA KOYOOKO & Co, Advocates or any other Advocates, under Order III Rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules, is in the same Application seeking other orders such as orders of stay or injunction or any others in favour of the Applicant party, such an application, in my opinion, becomes tainted with incompetence which, in law, is improper to grant. Accordingly, this Notice of Motion dated 28th September 2007 be and is hereby struck out. October 1, 2007 Khamoni J
Original judgment
Geom Holdings (k) Ltd George Williams Omondi Getrude Atieno Omondi v Co-operative Merchant Bank Ltd Co-operative Bank of Kenya
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.