Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Charles Munene v Weru Tea Factory Co.ltd

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU Civil Case 57 of 2007 CHARLES MUNENE ………………………………………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS WERU TEA FACTORY CO.LTD …….………..…….….. DEFENDANT RULING This is yet another application against the respondent seeking that it pays to the applicant Kshs.74,385/= in green tea leaves received by the respondent. It is a relief for a mandatory injunction which can only be granted at this stage in very clear cases and where there are special circumstances. The dispute in this application is not clear as I have not heard the respondent. There are no special circumstances which would warrant the grant of interlocutory mandatory injunction. It is only after hearing the suit, either in the absence of the respondent or interpartes that such a relief can be granted. Clearly from the affidavit in support of this application, the applicant has intimated that the reason why the respondent has refused to pay up. It would be premature to grant the relief sought. In the result this application must fail and is dismissed. There will be no orders as to costs. DATED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007 W. OUKO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.