REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Criminal Appeal 46 of 2006 HARUN MURIITHI NGUNGI………..…………………….APPELLANT VERUS REPUBLIC………………………..........…………...….RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The appellant pleaded guilty to the offence charged contrary to section 359 Penal Code. Thus saving court time. He was found with a forged currency Note of Shs.1000/=. The note was examined by government experts and found to be forged. Appellant was a first offender. He said he was sorry. The sentence prescribed for the offence of 7 years imprisonment. The appellant was given 3 years which he now says is excessive and harsh. He has been in custody since arrest 19/1/2006 and he has now served a period of almost one year. He appears remorseful. He says he was given the note. He did not forge it. It is true that the Trial Magistrate is the proper person to assess punishment but taking the circumstances of this case, I am of the view that the appellant has learnt his lesson for the period he has spent in jail. He is young person. I set aside the sentence of imprisonment ordered by the Trial Magistrate and substitute the same with a unconditional discharge. The appellant shall be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated this 1st March, 2007. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.