REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Criminal Appeal 5 of 2006 PURITY WANDIA KAGANE……………………...……..………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………………………..……………….RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The State concedes this appeal saying the evidence tendered by prosecution was not sufficient to support conviction of appellant. It is clear that both complainants and appellant were involved in a scuffle in a place where members of public were to be found. The people who may have given independent evidence were not called by prosecution to give evidence although it is shown that many people were present. Therefore the offence which could have been charged was under section 92- affray. That offence requires that persons who engage in a fight in a public place be charged with a misdemeanor punishable with imprisonment for one year. In this case the appellant was sentenced to a fine of Shs.30,000/= or in default 9 months imprisonment. In this case only the appellant was charged. The evidence is not sufficient to support the charge under section 251 Penal Code. I therefore find that the conviction was based on insufficient evidence and since the state does not support the conviction, I allow the appeal and quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. The appellant shall be set at liberty forthwith. It is so ordered. Dated this 3rd July, 2007. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE 3/7/2007 Khaminwa – Judge Mr. Maina Kagio for Appellant Appellant present J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.