Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Duncan Githinji Njeru v 1. Minister of Finance & 3 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Civil Case 88 of 2006 DUNCAN GITHINJI NJERU……………………….…...…..…………APPLICANT VERSUS 1. MINISTER OF FINANCE…………………...……......……1ST RESPONDENT 2. COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE…………….........….2ND RESPONDENT 3. STATUTORY MANAGER UNITED INSURANCE............3RD RESPONDENT 4. HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL……………….....…….…...4TH RESPONDENT AND MONICA WACUKA NGERA………………....................….INTERESTED PARTY RULING Before the court is application dated 20/11/2006 which orders to set aside orders made in this court on 23/10/2006 to the effect that execution of orders made in HCC No. 75 of 1998 be stayed. The grounds are set out in the body of the application and also supporting affidavit sworn by applicant’s advocate Mr. Macharia Muraguri. The main ground is that the stay orders were made before hearing the judgment creditor in suit HCC No. 75 of 1998 who is affected who holds a judgment made in his favour on 2/7/2004. That the Applicant stands to suffer hardship by the delay of execution of his decree which is valid and not appeal from or set aside. This application is opposed by the exparte applicant who has filed 4 grounds of opposition. I have perused the same. The Respondent does not need protection against the Applicant in HCC No. 75 of 1998. He is required to satisfy judgment lawfully entered against him in favour of the Applicant. The issues raised in this suit do not concern the applicant. It is not sought to set aside judgment or to appeal against the same. It is a matter between the Respondent and his insurers. The judgment is against the Respondent only. His insurers are not party suit HCC. No. 75/98. To delay a party from enjoying the fruits of judgment since 2/7/2004 is doing injustice to him. I therefore allow the application and grant orders sought. The exparte orders made on 23.10.2006 are hereby set aside to the extent of order number 3 thereof. Costs shall be in the cause. Dated this 16th January, 2007 J.N. KHAMINWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.