Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v The Chairman Mwea Division Ldt & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU Misc Appli 160 of 2007 REPUBLIC ……………………..…………………………...………APPLICANT VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN MWEA DIVISION LDT………..……….1ST RESPONDENT GRACE WANGUI MWANGI………….…….….…………..2ND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT By Notice of Motion Exparte Application Mugo Kagiri seeks orders of Certiorari to quash the award of Mwea Land Disputes Tribunal over a village plot at Kanaro attachéd to Rice Holding No.337 Mahigaini village and the decree that resulted after adoption of the award as decree of court in Wang’uru Resident Magistrate’s Court. The statutory statement shows the grounds upon which the orders are sought mainly that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to make the award and the decree was therefore null and void. Documents filed on 2/12/2005 are the proceedings of the Tribunal. It is clear from the proceedings that the land in dispute is attached to a Rice Holding. It is not a Rice Holding. It is also clear that the plot in dispute is not registered in favour of anyone under the land Regulation law reads Registered Land Act Cap. 300. It is for disputes such as these that Land Disputes Tribunal Act was enacted. There is no proof that the land in dispute was under the Irrigation Board. I therefore find that the decision of the Tribunal was made within the Tribunals jurisdiction. I dismiss the application. No order as to costs as the interested party acted for himself Orders accordingly. Dated this 31st January, 2007. J. N. KHAMINWA JUDGE 31/1/2007 Khaminwa- Judge Njue- Clerk Ms. Thungu for Applicant. Judgment read in open court in their presence. J. N. KHAMINWA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Republic v The Chairman Mwea Division Ldt & 1 other — Original judgment | Caselaw