REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CIVIL SUIT 154 OF 2007 DANIEL WAITHAKA MWANGI…………...............PLAINTIFF VERSUS NARC-KENYA………..……………………...1ST DEFENDANT RAPHAEL TUJU………..…………………...2ND DEFENDANT MUKHISA KITUYI………….………………...3RD DEFENDANT MORRIS DZORO……..……………………...4TH DEFENDANT ERASTUS KIHARA MUREITHI…..……...…..5TH DEFENDANT SAMUEL MUREITHI WAHOME...….……….6TH DEFENDANT STEPHEN MAINA KANYORO………....……7TH DEFENDANT AND PETER WAHOME KAMOCHE…..……………….APPLICANT RULING The applicant in this application, seeks to be enjoined as a party to this suit. However he has not disclosed to the court what claim or cause of action he has against the defendants or the plaintiff. His main gripe appears to be that he has been adversely mentioned by the affidavits filed by the defendants. He has however filed a replying affidavit in a reply to all the allegations made against him. I do not see any legal reason advanced by the applicant to persuade this court to have him enjoined to this suit. He has not availed any material to the court in form of a draft statement of claim that could persuade this court to exercise its discretion and enjoin him in the suit. For that reason his application lacks merit and is hereby dismissed with costs to the defendants. DATED at NAKURU this 4th day of SEPTEMBER, 2007 L. KIMARU JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.