Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Robert Wekesa Wesonga

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Criminal Case 34 of 2000 REPUBLIC ……………………………………..……….. PROSECUTOR VERSUS ROBERT WEKESA WESONGA ………………………….. ACCUSED RULING I have considered the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses, the cross-examination and the submissions under the provisions of Section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. I am satisfied that the prosecution have placed before the Court sufficient evidence which compels this Court to place the accused on his Defence. The Accused has the right to address the Court in his Defence either personally or through his Advocate, he is entitled to give evidence and to call witnesses on his behalf. He can choose to give an unsworn statement if he chooses to do so. The defence hearing will take place on a date to be given now. ORDER Defence hearing will be on 12th April 2007 at 9 a.m. Assessors are entitled to be paid their sitting allowance for today. Since two of them are in another hearing they shall NOT be paid in this matter. Mr. Joseph Maiyo to be paid sitting allowance for today. DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON THIS 8TH MARCH, 2007. M. K. IBRAHIM JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.