Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Murimi Kanyi v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 312 of 2005 MURIMI KANYI……………………………..............…………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………….…………RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the Judgment of L. W. Gitari, Principal Magistrate, dated 18th July, 2003, in the Principal Magistrate’s court at Kerugoya, Criminal Case No.605 of 2002) JUDGMENT The Appellant was charged with robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the Penal Code in that on the 12th day of February, 2002 at Kagio Township in Kirinyaga District of the Central Province the Appellant jointly with another not before court and being armed with stones robbed Simon Muriithi Gatugi of cash Kshs. 150/-, one unga packet and bread using violence in which the said Simon Muriithi Gatugi was wounded. The Appellant was found guilty and sentenced to death. He filed this appeal and during the hearing, the learned Principal State Counsel, Mr. Charles Orinda conceded the appeal on three grounds: Firstly, part of the prosecution’s case was conducted by a prosecutor who was not qualified in terms of section 85 (2) of the criminal procedure code. The trial was therefore a nullity. Secondly, while there was a change of trial magistrates, section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code was not complied with. Thirdly, the evidence is not sufficient to support a conviction. We have looked at he recorded evidence and it appears that section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code was complied with and therefore ground number two does not exist. However, there remains two grounds, the first and the third grounds, each sufficient to make the Appellant’s appeal be allowed, the first ground having the additional effect of making the trial a nullity. In the circumstances therefore, we do hereby declare the trial of the Appellant a nullity, allow his appeal, quash his conviction and set aside the sentence imposed upon him. We do order that the Appellant be released forthwith unless lawfully detained in some other cause. Dated this 31st day of March, 2006. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.