Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

The District Commissioner, Nakuru District v Josphat Kariuki Simon Ndungu Peter Gichangi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Misc Appli 123 Of 2006 THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, NAKURU DISTRICT……………….…RESPONDENT VERSUS JOSPHAT KARIUKI SIMON NDUNGU PETER GICHANGI ..……………....................................………………….APPLICANTS RULING I have perused the application for leave filed by the applicants in this case. The applicants are seeking judicial review orders of prohibition against the respondent, the District Commissioner, Nakuru. Having examined the complaint made against the District Commissioner, I am not persuaded that the District Commissioner was or is acting in a quasi-judicial capacity to enable this court to intervene. I have read the authorities supplied to this court by the applicants which give instances under which the court can prohibit administrative officials from taking certain actions. It is doubtful if the said authorities are applicable in the circumstances of this case. However so that the issues raised by the applicant may be ventilated, whatever its merits, I hereby grant the applicants leave to file for orders of judicial review as prayed in paragraph (a) of the application. The said leave shall operate to stay the respondent from dealing with the suit parcel of land pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion. The applicants shall file a substantive motion within twenty one (21) days of today’s date. The costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the substantive motion. DATED at NAKURU this 20th day of March 2006. L. KIMARU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.