Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Bethwel Kandie v Kenya Tea Development Agency & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Case 1213 Of 2002 BETHWEL KANDIE…………………………………………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA TEA DEVELOPMENT AGENCY…………………………1ST DEFENDANT NGERE TEA FACTORY CO. LTD………………………...………2ND DEFENDANT JOHN CHEGE KAROBA…………………………………………..3RD DEFENDANT RULING The defendant by this Notice of Motion dated 2nd November 2005 seeks orders that the plaintiff’s suit be dismissed with costs for want of prosecution. He also prays for costs of the suit as well as of this application. The application is premised on the ground that the suit was filed on 5th July 2002 and no steps have been taken to set down the same for hearing. The application is opposed by the plaintiff who blames the former advocate on record who never informed the plaintiff of what was going on. He was instructed and came on record on 8th February 2006 after the plaintiff was served with this application. He also blames the defendant for delay in that although the plaint was filed on 5th July 2002 he only filed his defence on 10th February 2005 about 3 years later. The plaintiff has given valid reasons why he never took steps. He was let down by his previous lawyer. He has now engaged another lawyer and is ready to pursue this suit. He should be allowed to do so and if the defendant is awarded adequate costs, there will be no injustice. The application is dismissed but the plaintiff will bear the costs of this application. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of February 2006. J.L.A. OSIEMO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.