Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2686 of 2006

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 287 of 2003 GEOFFREY MURIITHI LAWRENCE………………..............…………..APPELLANT Versus REPUBLIC……………………………………………………………..RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the judgment of J. N. Nyaga, Senior Resident Magistrate, dated 24th July 2003, in the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court, Karatina, Criminal Case No.444 of 2003) JUDGEMENT The Appellant was charged with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code, but was convicted of robbery contrary to section 296 (1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to four years imprisonment with four strokes of the cane. When his appeal came before us for hearing, the learned State Counsel, m/s Ngalyuka told us that she was conceding the appeal because the trial of the Appellant was a nullity as the prosecutor, Police Constable Muindi, was not a qualified prosecutor in terms of Section 85 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State Counsel added that she was not asking for a retrial. We have looked at the record from the trial magistrate’s court and we have no reason to disagree with what the State Counsel said, the Appellant having also accepted it. Accordingly, we do hereby declare the trial of the Appellant a nullity, allow his appeal, quash his conviction and set aside the sentence imposed upon him. The Appellant be set at liberty forthwith unless lawfully detained in some other cause. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2006. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE H. M. OKWENGU JUDGE Present: The Appellant in person. M/s Ngalyuka for the Republic

page 1 of 2

Martin Mwangi – Court clerk

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.