Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stanley Njau Wainaina v Meshack M. Munyalo Benjamin Mwikua Musyoki

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Appeal 733 of 2005 STANLEY NJAU WAINAINA…………………...............................………… APPELLANT VERSUS MESHACK M. MUNYALO BENJAMIN MWIKUA MUSYOKI…………........................................….RESPONDENTS RULING This Notice of Motion, dated 22/9/05 under Order 41 Rule 4; Order 50 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and Sections 3A, 63(e), 79 (G) and 95 of Cap. 21, Laws of Kenya, seeks the following orders: 1. ) 2. ) ….Already spent 3. Stay of execution of the Court order dated 31/8/05 in Kithimani – Yatta RMCC No. 134 of 2004, pending the appeal herein. 4. Costs to be in the cause. The application is on the grounds stated on the face of the Notice of Motion, and is supported by an Affidavit by Stanley Wainaina Njau dated 23/9/05. In opposition, the Respondents, through their Replying Affidavit filed on 24/10/05 aver, inter alia that application lacks merit and is meant to delay the realization by the Respondents of their fruits of the judgement, and that the Respondent is a person of means and payment of the decretal sum would not render the appeal, if it succeeds, nugatory. In the cause of the hearing of the application, it became clear that the applicant has not complied with the tenents of Order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, in that he has not offered any security, no shown that if the sum is paid to the Respondent, prior to the appeal, the same will have been put beyond the reach of the appellant as the Respondent is not a person of means. This is what is referred to in the Order and Rule above, a substantial loss. After due perusal and consideration of the pleadings herein, and the submissions by counsel for both sides, this court rules as under: 1. That application for stay pending appeal is hereby dismissed with costs to the Respondent and against the appellant/applicant for failure to meet the requirements of the law under which it is brought. DATED and delivered in Nairobi this 20th day of June, 2006. O.K. MUTUNGI

page 1 of 2

JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.