REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Misc Appli 177 of 2004 NANYUKI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL …………...............………………………APPLICANT Versus COMMISSIONER OF LANDS…………………….............………….1ST RESPONDENT CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR……………………..……............………2ND RESPONDENT RULING From what has been brought to my attention during the hearing of the Notice of Motion (Ex-parte) dated 6th November, 2004, the same is hereby dismissed for the following reasons: First, the application does not show, in the head notes, who the other intended parties are. Secondly, Order L III Rule 2 fixing the period within which leave to file proceedings for orders of certiorari must be sought is mandatory. Thirdly, order XLIX of the Civil Procedure Rules, like any other Civil Procedure Rules, other than order L III, do not apply to Judicial Review proceedings. Dated this 21st day of may, 2006. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE
Original judgment
Nanyuki Municipal Council v Commissioner of Lands & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.