REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Misc Appli 998 of 2005 KAMUNYORI & COMPANY ADVOCATES ………......................…….....APPLICANT VERSUS CANNON ASSURANCE (K) LIMITED……………......................……RESPONDENT RULING The applicant with the bill of costs had his bill taxed on 23 rd February 2006 at the amount of kshs 234, 792/-. A certificate of costs was issued, thereof, on 24 th March 2006. That certificate of costs has not been altered varied or set aside to date. The applicant has moved this court by a Notice of Motion seeking judgment on the taxed amount under Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act. The applicant stated that since retainer has not been disputed by the Respondent, the applicant was entitled to judgment as prayed. I have considered the applicant’s application and the submissions of counsel in support and I do hereby find that the application is merited. I accordingly grant the following orders: (1) That judgment be and is hereby entered for kshs 234, 792 with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the 28th April 2006 until payment in full. (2) The applicant is awarded costs of the Notice of Motion dated 28th April 2006. MARY JUDGE Dated and delivered this 13th day of June 2006. MARY KASANGO JUDGE KASANGO
Original judgment
KAMUNYORI & COMPANY ADVOCATES v CANNON ASSURANCE K LIMITED
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.