REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Civil Suit 143 of 1999 MATHIAS KINIALE SIFUNA ..................................................................................................PLAINTIFF VS EASTERN KITUI STORES & 2 OTHERS...................................................................DEFENDANTS RULING By an ex-parte oral application, pursuant to the provisions of order XV, Rule 10(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, the applicant sought orders for issuance of warrant of arrest against the directors of the first defendant herein who were summoned to appear in person for oral examination as to the debts due and owing to the judgment debtor herein and if so the manner of satisfying the decree. It is instructive to note that the procedure to bring such an application is not provided for under Order XV, Rule 10(3). Accordingly, an applicant falls back to Order L, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code which provides: “All applications to the court, save where otherwise expressly provided for under these Rules, shall be by motion and shall be heard in open court”. I have no application by way of Notice of Motion upon which I can act. Accordingly, I direct the applicant to make the necessary application within 30 days from the date of this order. DATED and DELIVERED at BUNGOMA this 14th day of June 2006. N.R.O. OMBIJA JUDGE
Original judgment
Mathias Kiniale Sifuna v Eastern Kitui Stores & 2 Others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.