Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mary Waithira Kanyari v Kantafu Company Limited Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Case 44 of 2003 MARY WAITHIRA KANYARI .........................................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTAFU COMPANY LIMITED KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY LIMITED........................................................DEFENDANTS RULING After hearing submissions into the Notice of Motion dated 19 th June 2005 by the applicant/2 nd defendant, I have since noted that the plaintiff/Respondent herself, who stands to be affected by the orders sought in this application, was not served in person. The affidavit of service was handed over to the court at the time the application was heard. This affidavit shows that the persons served were plaintiffs/Respondent’s advocates. It would be unfair to make any ruling in the matter without the Respondents prior knowledge of this application even if the service to her may or may not affect the ruling. Consequently, I set aside the proceedings of this court on 11th May, 2006. Further I order that the plaintiff/Respondent be served in person together with the firm of advocates representing her for inter partes hearing on a date to be set in court. Dated 17th May, 2006, at Machakos. J. LESIIT JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.