REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Civil Misc Appli 79 of 2005 REPUBLIC ...............................................................................................PLAINTIFF V E R S U S RHODAH C. CHENDEKHA ..........................................................INTERESTED PARTY A N D THE CHAIRMAN, ILEHO LAND DISPUTES TRUBUNAL .........................RESPONDENT RULING The exparte applicant, Patrick Muleshi Ingati, applied in his Notice of Motion dated 23-11-05 for an order of CERTIORARI to bring into this court for quashing the decision of ILEHO LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL which had been filed in the Kakamega Chief Magistrate’s court Misc. Award No. 115 of 2005 for adoption as a judgement of the court. The verifying affidavit sworn on 24-10-05 by the exparte applicant did not annexe the decision sought to be quashed or the proceedings of the Ileho Land Disputes Tribunal which were alleged to have been conducted in absence of the exparte applicant who claimed that he was denied the right to be heard. The verifying affidavit is deficient of vital evidence and the order sought cannot be granted in absence of such evidence. I have carefully perused the application and the affidavits and considered the submissions of counsel and it is my finding that there is no evidence to support the Notice of Motion and therefore the orders sought cannot be granted. The Notice of Motion dated 23-11-05 if hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. Dated, signed and delivered at Kakamega this 8th day of June, 2006 G. B. M. KARIUKI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.