REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Misc Appli 293 of 2005 MBUGUA & MBUGUA ADVOCATES …………….....................................................………… APPLICANT VERSUS OCCIDENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ……………………………………… RESPONDENT RULING The Applicant/Advocate has brought a Notice of Motion dated 19th August, 2005. The application seeks for judgement in favour of the Applicant for Kshs.36,382/=. This amount is the subject of taxation on 10th June, 2005. The Applicant states that on the 10th June, 2005 the Advocate/client bill of costs was taxed and allowed in the sum of Kshs.36,382/=. That the Respondent since the said taxation has not filed a reference or an appeal against the said taxation. The Applicant therefore, prays that the court will enter judgement in terms of the taxation. The court finds that the Applicant’s application complies with the Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and the same is merited. The court grants the following orders:1) v 2) That judgement is entered for the Applicant for Kshs.36,382/=. Page 1 That the Applicant is granted the costs of the application dated 19th August, 2005. MARY KASANGO JUDGE Dated and delivered this 29th day of September, 2006. MARY KASANGO JUDGE
Original judgment
Mbugua & Mbugua Advocates v Occidental Insurance Company Limited
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.