Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

John Njoroge Gitau v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 379 of 2003 JOHN NJOROGE GITAU ………..............................................……............ …………………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………....................................................... …….RESPONDENT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 381 OF 2003 PETER MAINA GACHOYA …………........................................................………………… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………..............................................……………....... ………………………..RESPONDENT ( An appeal from the Judgment of C.D. Nyamweya , Senior Resident Magistrate, dated 30th September, 2003; In Criminal Case No. 1107 of 2003 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court, Nyeri.) JUDGMENT The learned Provincial State Counsel Mr. Charles Orinda, concedes these appeals on the ground that the prosecutor was not qualified in terms of Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State Counsel does not ask for retrial. There is also the fact that the record made by the learned trial Magistrate during the trial does not show that witnesses were being sworn before they gave evidence and in the circumstances we have to assume that witnesses were not being sworn and that the evidence on record was not taken in accordance with the law.

page 1 of 2

The above being the position, we do hereby declare the trial of the appellants a nullity. Allow the appeal of each appellant. Quash the conviction of each appellant and set aside the sentence imposed. Each appellant shall be released forthwith unless lawfully detained in some other cause. Dated this 26th day of September, 2006. J.M.KHAMONI JUDGE H.M. OKWENGU JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.