Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Eliud Kamau Njoroge v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Criminal Appeal 98 of 2004 (Appeal arising from the original conviction in Criminal Case Number 1760 of 2001 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Muranga by G. K. Mwaura –S.R.M.) ELIUD KAMAU NJOROGE…………........................................…………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…….................................……………………….……………………..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Eliud Kamau Njoroge hereinafter referred to as the appellant was tried jointly with Stephen Njuguna Gitau alias Desh and John Maina Mwangi alias Brown before the Senior Resident Magistrate Muranga, on two charges of Robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the penal code. The appellant’s co-accused were acquitted of the charges whilst the appellant was convicted of simple robbery under Section 296 (1) of the penal code and sentenced to serve 14 years imprisonment. The appellant has now appealed against his conviction and sentence. Learned Principal State Counsel Mr. Orinda indicated that he does not support the conviction as the appellant’s trial was a nullity the prosecution having been conducted by an incompetent person. We have perused the record of appeal and have confirmed that the prosecution of the appellant was partly conducted by P.C. Machuki a person who is not competent to prosecute under section 85 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. We therefore concur with the learned Principal State Counsel allow this appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence imposed. The appellant shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated, signed and delivered this 28th September 2006. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE H. M. OKWENGU JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.