REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Civil Appeal 123 of 1999 PETER MUCHIRI KARIUKI …………….............................…………………. APPELLANT VERSUS GILBERT KARIUKI …………...........................…………………………… RESPONDENT RULING Gilbert Kariuki the applicant seeks to have the appeal brought against him by Peter Muchiri Kariuki struck out on the grounds that the appellant has failed to serve him or his advocate with the memorandum of appeal 7 months after the appellant was notified of the admission of his appeal. It is evident from the court record that the appellant’s advocate was notified of the admission of the appeal on the 12th July 2001. A copy of the letter has been duly stamped received by the advocate. The appellant cannot therefore claim that he had no knowledge of the admission of the appeal. The appellant’s lack of interest in the appeal has been demonstrated by the manner in which they have handled this application. I concur with the applicant’s advocate that the applicant lacks interest in this appeal. I find that the applicant is abusing the process of the court by delaying the appeal and it is only fair and just that this court exercises its inherent jurisdiction under Section 3A of the civil Procedure Act to prevent such an abuse. Accordingly I grant the application and I strike out the appeal. Costs to the applicant. Dated signed and delivered this 18th October 2006 H. M. OKWENGU JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.