Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 371 of 2006

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII Criminal Appeal 63 of 2005 RICHARD OMANGI SAURI ……..……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ……………….…………….…………..…….. RESPONDENT (From original conviction and sentence of the RM’s court at Keroka in criminal case No. 504 of 2005 – A.A. INGUTYA, S.R.M.) JUDGMENT: Appellant was convicted for the offence of Arson contrary to section 322 (a) of the Penal Code in that on 16th June 2005 at Miriri Sub-Location in Nyamira District willfully and unlawfully set fire to a building namely Kitchen belonging to Sabina Nyaboke Sauri. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. He has appealed against the sentence. The learned state counsel considered to the appeal and stated that the sentence was excessive. I have considered the appeal. Though it is against sentence only. I find that the charge appellant was convicted of was defective. He was charged with offence of Arson contrary to s.322 (a) Penal Code. There is no offence like that. S. 322 (a) of the Penal Code provides for the offence of handling stolen property and not of Arson. Offence of Arson is provided for in s. 332 of the Penal Code but this was not the section quoted in the charge sheet. The charge was therefore clearly defective and on that score alone the conviction was wrong. I therefore quash the conviction and set aside the sentence. Appellant be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. Dated 7th March 2006. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE Cc – Mobisa Mr. Kemo for respondent

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

High Court 371 of 2006 — Original judgment | Caselaw