Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 3142 of 2005

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004 (From Original conviction (s) and Sentence (s) in Criminal Case No. 681 of 2003 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kangundo N.N. Njagi SRM 29/10/03) JOHN MUEMA KAMOLA ………………………………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………. RESPONDENT JUDGEMENT The appellant was convicted of handling stolen livestock, that is, a sheep. He was sentenced to seven years imprisonment. He appealed against the conviction and sentence. The state rightly conceded the appeal because the prosecution was conducted by a police constable contrary to the provisions of Section 85 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. For this reason, there is no dispute that the trial was a nullity and this appeal should be allowed on that ground alone. Mr O’Mirera, sought a retrial. I have considered the facts of this case. The one sheep found in possession of the appellant was so found a year after the livestock of complainant were stolen. He gave a defence to the effect that he had bought the sheep from a given person who was called and testified, stating that he had not sold the sheep. In my view, even if the third party denied selling the sheep, the appellant’s defence was not thereby nullified and make impossible. There is no way the alleged seller could accept selling the sheep to appellant because that could make him the thief or handler. It is my view, therefore, that the chances of securing a conviction on a retrial are minimal. In addition the appellant has served a substantial part of his sentence. It may not be fair and just to expose him to a fresh sentence. Accordingly, the request for a retrial is refused as not in the interest of justice. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The conviction is quashed and the sentence of 7 years imprisonment set aside. The appellant is ordered set at liberty from prison forthwith unless otherwise therein lawfully held. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered at Machakos this 8th day of November 2005.

page 1 of 2

D.A. ONYANCHA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.