REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO.16 OF 2003 REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………. PROSECUTOR VERSUS SIMION NYAKERARIO MARWA ) JACKSON CHACHA MAKENGE ) ……………………………. ACCUSED TOGO MAROA ONGOSO ) RULING The accused persons were arraigned in court on 15th May 2003 charged with the offence of murder c/s.203 as read with S.204 of the Penal Code. Particulars wee that on 18th May 2002 at Nyamachanga trading centre of Kuria District they jointly murdered SABORA BWIRO. They appeared before JUSTICE WAMBILYANGAH (as then was) and pleaded not guilty. Hearing started before the same judge on 9th July 2003, two witnesses were heard and case adjourned to 12th August 2003 when two other witnesses were heard. After that case was adjourned to 16th October 2003. By then however the Judge had retired from the judiciary. Later I directed the case to start a fresh. Mr. Bosire has urged the court to declare the trial before justice Wambilyangah a mistrial. Mr. Chirchir the learned State Counsel concurred, and rightly so. As I have stated four witnesses had given evidence by the time Justice Wambilyangah left service. He cannot be recalled to finalise the hearing of the case. The trial before him is therefore a mistrial, even if this court had directed hearing to start a fresh. I therefore declare that trial a mistrial and discharge all the accused person. The Attorney General is however at liberty to bring fresh charges against the accused person if he so wishes. Dated this 25th April 2005. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE cc. Mobisa Mr. Marwa for Accused Mr. Bosire for 2nd Accused. Mr. Kemo for state.
Original judgment
Republic v Simion Nyakerario Marwa ) Jackson Chacha Makenge ) & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.