Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rebecca Waithira Joseph) Abel Nguru Kimondo ) v Hannah Wambui Kibu

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Civil Case 198 of 2001 REBECCA WAITHIRA JOSEPH) ABEL NGURU KIMONDO )…………………….……………….PLAINTIFF Versus HANNAH WAMBUI KIBU……………………………………..…….DEFENDANT RULING In Chamber Summons dated 17th January, 2002, the two Plaintiffs/Applicants want the Defendant’s/Respondent’s defence herein be struck out for disclosing no defence. During the hearing of this Chamber Summons, there was no appearance for the Defendant/Respondent and the Applicants did not say much. It is not clear why the Defendant who filed a defence is not reacting to summonses relating to this Chamber Summons and has therefore not filed a replying affidavit. The Chamber Summons is brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order IXA of the Civil Procedure Rules. I have read the plaint, the defence and the affidavit supporting this Chamber Summons and do not find the Defendant’s defence to be a sham because even if there is a written agreement and the Defendant’s counsel is a witness to all transactions, there are triable issues such as whether the alleged sale is null and void for lack of consent of the Land Control Board. Accordingly, the Chamber Summons dated 17th January, 2002 is hereby dismissed. The Defendant/Respondent receives no costs of this Chamber Summons as she did not come out to oppose it. Dated this 1st day of July, 2005. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.