Samuel Obondi Wandiga v Kenya Wildlife Service & Another

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Suit 975 of 2003 SAMUEL OBONDI WANDIGA……………….……………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE & ANOTHER………....DEFENDANTS RULING The Applicant applies to strike out the 1st Defendant’s defence on the grounds that it does not disclose a reasonable Defence. Striking out a pleading is a remedy to be used sparingly. In this case the 1st Defendant denies it unlawfully terminated the Plaintiff’s employment. It is open to the Plaintiff to apply for particulars as to how the employment was lawfully terminated but as pleaded it raises a triable issue. With regard to malicious prosecution the 1st Defendant states it was not a party involved in the prosecution of the Plaintiff. This again raises a triable issue. In the result l dismiss this application with costs to the Respondent. DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI on 17th February 2005 P.J RANSLEY JUDGE