Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1977 of 2005

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 21 OF 2004 REPUBLIC ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PROSECUTOR VERSUS LIVINGSTONE LITAYWA :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ACCUSED JUDGEMENT The State failed to offer evidence in this case to prove the charge of murder which the accused is facing and closed its case yesterday. As the charge has not been proved, the accused is entitled to an acquittal. I accordingly acquit him. Unless otherwise lawfully held, the accused shall be released forthwith and set free. I seize this opportunity to deprecate the manner in which the police in this District continue to attend to investigations in Criminal cases and particularly the cavaliar manner in which the issue of bonding of witnesses is handled. Far too often adjournments are sought because the police have failed to bond witnesses. This has resulted in waste of valuable judicial time. Where witnesses are not produced on the day of the hearing, this court shall not hesitate to dismiss cases unless there are sound and plausible grounds to justify adjournment. I hasten to add that the police must take seriously the issue of bonding of witnesses. Unless this is done and witnesses produced in court on the dates when cases are fixed for hearing, the system of fixing cases for hearing will become scandalous and a mockery. We require an efficient system in which cases proceed to hearing when they are fixed unless there are compelling reasons to adjourn. It is also necessary for the court to once again re-echo that the constitution of Kenya requires persons held in connection with capital offences to be charged within 14 days of arrest or detention and it is illegal to hold any citizen for a period longer than this. Once charged, an accused person must be afforded a fair hearing within a reasonable time. These constitutional requirements must be adhered to. Dated at Kakamega this 13th day of July, 2005. G. B. M. KARIUKI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.