Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Jrn and Yfop –n v H Nwk

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Adoption Cause 9 of 2005 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001 IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF MRRO AND HNR (MINORS) BY JRN AND YFOP –N AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ORDERS OF ADOPTION OF THE CHILDREN BY JRN AND YFOP –N BETWEEN JRN AND YFOP –N ………….....................………………........………………… APPLICANTS AND H NWK ……………………………….......................................………..……… RESPONDENTS

page 1 of 2

COURT I have read and considered this application. The children are orphans both their parents having died. The first Applicant JRN is a parternal uncle to the children. Both the Applicants are lawfully married and are aged 31 and 32 years old respectively. They are employed and have means of taking care of the children. No member of JRNs’ family has any objection to the adoption order being made. Both JRNs’ parents who are also the grand parents of the children are in court and have raised no objection. The Children’s department has also recommended the adoption. In the circumstances I am satisfied that it is in the best interest of the children if an adoption order is made. I therefore order that JRN and YFOP-N are hereby authorized to adopt the two children MRR and HNRO. The children shall henceforth be known as MRR and HNRO. The Registrar of Births and Deaths is hereby directed to issue fresh birth certificates to the children in their present names. The Registrar General is also directed to make an entry of this adoption in the Adoption Register. DATED and delivered this 6th day of April 2005. D.K. MARAGA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.