IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 485 of 2005 ALITA GITHIRE T/A KINGS RESTAURANT ………... APPELLANT VERSUS TECHNO TRADE PAVILLION LTD ………………… RESPONDENT RULING In this Chamber Summons application dated 12th July, 2005, and brought under Sections 79G and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21, Order XXXIX Rule 2 2A(1), Order XLI Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all other enabling Provisions of the Law, the Appellant seeks, in the main, the following Order:The prayer sought is unclear. Although from the annexed supporting affidavit it would appear that the applicant seeks an Order restraining his Respondent/Landlord from evicting him, this is not at all clear from the prayer sought. This court cannot make orders that are not sought, and as it is not clear to this Court, what orders are sought, this application is disallowed with costs to the Respondent. Any interim orders herein are vacated. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19th day of September, 2005. ALNASHIR VISRAM JUDGE
Original judgment
Alita Githire T/A Kings Restaurant v Techno Trade Pavillion Ltd
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.