Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ishmael Kagunyi Thande v Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI Civil Case 336 of 2003 ISHMAEL KAGUNYI THANDE…………...……………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY OF KENYA LIMITED…………………………………………DEFENDANT RULING Rule 4 of Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules (the Rules) provides that if any subsequent suit shall be brought before payment of the costs of a discontinued suit upon the same or substantially the same cause of action the court may order a stay of such subsequent suit until such costs shall have been paid. In the present case it is clear that the previous suit, HCCC No. 896 of 2000, which was between the same parties upon substantially the same cause of action, was not discontinued by the Plaintiff herein, who was also the plaintiff in that previous suit. It was struck out by order of the court. Rule 4 aforesaid cannot

page 1 of 2

therefore be properly invoked. In any event, consequent upon subsequent proceedings and orders herein, especially the order entered on 21st June, 2005, the court was informed on 19th July, 2005 that the costs in the previous suit have since been paid. As the application by notice of motion dated 25th June, 2004 (in which the Defendant sought an order to stay the present suit pending payment by the Plaintiff of the costs in the previous suit) has not been withdrawn it is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2005.H.P.G. WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2005.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.