Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Certiorari and Mandamus v Senior Principal Magistrate & 1 other

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Civil Misc Cause 37 of 2005 IN THE MATTER OFAN APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY ZACHARIA WAKHUNGU BARAZA T/A SIUMA TRADERS REPUBLIC…………………………….……………..……APPLICANT VS SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE…………. 1ST RESPONDENT HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL……………..……2ND RESPONDENT EX PARTE ZACHARIA WAKHUNGU BARAZA…………….….. APPLICANT AND CHESIKAKI RURAL SOCIETY (SACCO)..INTERESTED PARTY RULING Pursuant to the provisions of Order LIII rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules the applicant sought for leave to apply for the orders of certiorari and mandamus to quash a decision of the Senior Principal Magistrate, Bungoma in Bungoma S.P.M. Misc. Application No. 39 B of 2004 dated 20.1.2005. The summons is ex parte in nature and this court is required to apply the test as whether the applicant has an arguable case if a substantive application were to be filed. I have perused the material placed before me and I think the applicant has no arguable case. Consequently leave is refused. DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 8th DAY OF February 2005 J.K. SERGON JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.