Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Mugo Mwangi v The Hon. Attorney General

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Misc Appli 1715 of 2004 JOSEPH MUGO MWANGI ……………………..….……… APPLICANT VERSUS THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………….. RESPONDENT RULING This is an application to file suit out of time and is brought by way of a Notice of Motion rather than an Originating Summon. It does not cite the provisions of law under which it is brought. Because this application is made by a lay person, I will chose to ignore the procedural inadequacies, and go straight to the merit of the application. Section 3 (1) of the Public Authorities Limitation Act, Cap 39 prescribes a time limit of 12 months from the date of the cause of action for the filing of a suit against the Government of Kenya, arising out of an action in tort. Here the cause of action arose on 22nd May, 2000, and this application was made more than four years later on 14th December, 2004. The only reason provided for the delay in filing suit is “the lack of finance to pay for legal fees.” That is not a sufficiently good reason for not filing the suit in time, and in any event does not constitute “disability” envisaged by Section 5 of Cap 39. In addition, the delay is highly inordinate, and accordingly, this application is dismissed with Costs to the Respondent. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 20th day of September, 2005. ALNASHIR VISRAM JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.