Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Industrial Development Bank Ltd. v Greenland Dairy Ltd (In Receivership)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI Misc Application 546 of 2005 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. ……………………...PLAINTIFF VERSUS GREENLAND DAIRY LTD (In Receivership) ….………………...DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff/applicant seek the following orders in their Chamber Summons dated 29th June 2005; (1) That the applicant be granted leave by this Honourable court to sell by Private Treaty Title No. NEW LARI TRADING CENTRE/78. The respondents were served but did not appear. The applicants granted the respondent a loan which the respondent utilized to buy a diary factory. That loan was secured by a debenture and a charge over the suit property. On the respondent defaulting in paying that loan the applicant sent the requisite demand notices and also placed the respondent under receivership. The said receiver is in the process of selling the movable assets of the respondent charged to the applicant. That the applicant wishes to sell the charged property which is valued for Kshs.13,548,000/= under forced sale. The applicants have received an offer to by private treaty for Kshs.30,500,000/=. Having examined the applicants charge particularly Clause 5 and 6, I am satisfied that the applicants can sell the charged property by private treaty. I therefore find that the applicants are entitled to prayers sought. I therefore grant the following orders:(1) That INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED is hereby granted leave to sell by private treaty Title Number NEW LARI TRADING CENTRE/78. (2) That the applicants are granted costs of the application dated 29.6.2005. Dated and Delivered this 12th October 2005. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.