REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Misc Civ Suit 109 of 2005 REPUBLIC…………………………………………………...………….APPLICANT VERSUS TOWN CLERK……………….………………………………….1ST RESPONDENT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF NAKURU………………………2ND RESPONDENT RULING The exparte applicant filed an application for mandamus by way of a notice of motion under the provisions of Order LIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking orders to compel the respondent to pay her Kshs.280,762/- plus interest and costs being the decretal sum and costs in Nakuru CMCC No. 1090 of 2004. The judgment in the aforesaid suit was entered against the respondent but the respondent had refused and/or failed to pay the same. The said application was not opposed by the respondent, having been served with the same. I have perused the documents on record and I am satisfied that the said application has merit and has been sufficiently proved and consequently I grant the orders as prayed therein. The respondent shall also bear the costs of the application. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED at Nakuru this 9th day of December, 2005. D. MUSINGA JUDGE 9/12/2005 Ruling delivered in open court in the presence of Mr. Githui for the applicant. D. MUSINGA JUDGE 9/12/2005
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.