IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Misc Appli 263 of 2003 SHAH & PAREKH ……………………………………………….………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS APOLLO INSURANCE CO. LTD ………………...………………….. DEFENDANT RULING In this application dated 30th May, 2005, made under Rule 11 (2) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, the Applicant seeks to set aside the taxing master’s decision on taxation delivered on 20th November, 2002 on the grounds that are stipulated on the body of the application. The application is not supported by an affidavit – at least there is none on file, and the Ruling outlining the reasons of the taxing master’s decision has not been annexed. This is mandatory. Without the benefit of those reasons, I cannot make a fair determination of this matter. Accordingly, I will strike out this application as being incompetently before this Court, with costs to the Respondent. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of December, 2005. ALNASHIR VISRAM JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.