REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Misc Civ Suit 903 of 2005 REPUBLIC …………………………………………………….………..APPLICANT VERSUS KADHI SHEIKH TWALIB ………………………………..……….RESPONDENT AND ARIF RAMADHAN KARAMA…………………………….INTERESTED PARTY RULING This is an application for leave to commence Judicial Review Proceedings for orders of certiorari and prohibition. It is alleged that Kadhi court has no jurisdiction to deal with custody of children. That jurisdiction, it is contended, is vested in the children’s court. That is a moot point. I therefore grant leave to apply as prayed. As to the leave operating as a stay I did ask Mr. Kenzi for the Applicant who has the custody of the child at present. He said it is the Applicant. At that stage Mr. Khatib who happened to be in court shot up and said that that is not correct. He said he acted for the interested party in the Kadhi’s court and knows that the child is at present with his client. He said his client had to enlist the help of the court Bailiff to get the child taken from the Applicant. As I pointed out to counsel to me this appears a delicate issue. It is traumatizing to have children forcibly thrown from one parent to another. In the circumstances I decline to direct hat the leave granted should operate as a stay. In any case there was nothing to be stayed if the child has already been taken by the interested party. Instead I direct that the application be filed and served within 15 days and be heard on priority basis. DATED and delivered this 18th day of November 2005 D. K. MARAGA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.