REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Case 428 of 2002 DANIEL K. KARIITHI ……………………………….....………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS BAMBURI CEMENT ………………………………..…………….DEFENDANT RULING Notice of Motion dated 3/8/05 seeks orders to extend time for Applicant to lodge and serve the amended plaint and that the amended plaint filed on 13/1/2005 be deemed to have been served within time. The delay in acting in time was due to the honest mistake by Plaintiff’s advocates in calculating time within which the same was to be filed after leave was granted. The application is opposed on the ground that the application is incompetent and no proper ground is advanced to warrant granting orders sought. I have perused the application and have considered the arguments of counsel. Parties should not be blocked in their pursuit of justice on technicalities. I do not see any prejudice that can be occasioned to defendant by granting the orders sought. The leave to amend was granted by court and it is by inadvertence, that the advocates failed to file and serve the papers in time. This is a common office mistake. Upon consideration of the above, I allow the application and grant orders prayed with costs. Delivered and dated at Mombasa this 11th day of October 2005. J. KHAMINWA JUDGE 11/10/05 Khaminwa, J Jason – Court Clerk Mr. Kibara No Appearance for Ghalia Ruling read in their presence. KHAMINWA, J
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.