Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Moses Muigai Kariuki v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Criminal Appli 35 of 2005 MOSES MUIGAI KARIUKI…………APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……..……………….RESPONDENT RULING The Application has been brought through Notice of Motion under Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap 75, Laws of Kenya. The application seeks the following orders:(a) That the Appellant be released on bail pending the determination of the appeal filed herein. (b) That in the alternative this Honourable Court do order that the execution of sentence be suspended pending the hearing and determination of the Applicant’s appeal. The application is based on the grounds that are shown on the surface of the same. During the hearing of the application, the Assistant Deputy Public Prosecutor never objected to the same on the ground that the Applicant will have served a substantial portion of his sentence before his appeal is heard. He also conceded that the draft Petition of Appeal had demonstrated that the intended appeal had overwhelming chances of success. In view of the sentiments expressed by Mr. Gumo, the Court hereby grants the Applicant, a Bond of Kshs.50,000/- with 2 Sureties to be approved by the Deputy Registrar, Nakuru. The appeal is also admitted to hearing before one Judge in Nakuru High Court. ORDER The Criminal Registry is hereby directed to fix the appeal for hearing before any Judge within the next 60 days. MUGA APONDI JUDGE 5TH MAY, 2005 Ruling read signed and delivered in open Court in the presence of Mr. Gumo for State and Mr. Orina for applicant. MUGA APONDI JUDGE 5TH MAY, 2005

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.