Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamed Abeid v Abdalla Ameir Nashi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Appeal 7 of 2005 MOHAMED ABEID …………………………………………………..…APPELLANT VERSUS ABDALLA AMEIR NASHI ……………………………….…………..RESPONDENT RULING Mr. Kenzi advocate for the landlord filed a suit in Chief Magistrate’s court claiming injunction against defendant and costs of the suit. The subject matter is some shop and butchery which the plaintiff claims are on his building. It is in the same premises that the landlord has issued a Notice to terminate tenancy under the provisions of Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment Act Cap 301). It is not disputed that a suit has been filed in Business Tribunal. Out of the proceedings in the subordinate court the applicant has filed an appeal against the ruling of the Learned Trial Magistrate on a Preliminary point on the issue of jurisdiction in the circumstances. There is no indication that this appeal is admitted. However the appellant has filed this Motion seeking an order for Stay of the hearing of the said CMCC No.5079/2004 pending hearing of the appeal. Upon considering the matter, I am persuaded that unless Stay is granted the Appellant’s appeal will be reduced nugatory. Jurisdiction to deal with disputes premises under the Act (Cap.301) is conferred on the Business Rent Tribunal and I am inclined to venture to say that this appeal has good chance of success. For the reasons above I allow application and grant orders sought with costs. Delivered and dated at Mombasa this 15th Day of December 2005. J. KHAMINWA JUDGE 15/12/05 Mr. Gichana Mr. Kenzi Ruling read in their presence. KHAMINWA, J

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.