REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI Civil Case 79 of 1995 GITHINJI KAGIRI……………………….…............................….1ST PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT WAMBUI THIONG’O………………….........................………..2ND PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT Versus THIONGO MURIITHI…..……............................…………....1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT PETER NGIRUBIU MURIITHI……...........................………2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING In this Notice of Motion dated 22nd December 2004 and brought under Order XLIV Rule 1, Order L Rules 1 and 12 and all enabling provisions of the law the Applicant prays for orders:“1. THAT this Honourable court be pleased to review its judgment of 18.10.2000 and all consequential orders. 2. THAT there be a stay of proceedings pending the outcome of this application. 3. THAT costs of this application be provided for.” Mr. Gathiga Mwangi appears for the Applicant while Mr. Kebuka Wachira appears for the Respondent. As I look at the grounds, on the face of the said Notice of Motion, in support of the Notice of Motion, I get the impression that the Notice of Motion is not properly brought and ought not to stand. Otherwise I entirely agree with what was said by Mr. Kebuka Wachira. Accordingly, I do hereby declare the said Notice of Motion incompetent and dismiss it with costs to the Respondents. Dated this 14th day of November 2005. J. M. KHAMONI JUDGE
Original judgment
Githinji Kagiri & 1 other v Thiongo Muriithi & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.