REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO.26 OF 2003 REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………….. PROSECUTOR VERSUS. 1. MUHONJA WAMBURA 2. MCHARI WAMBURA ………………………………… ACCUSED. RULING The two accused appeared first in court on 9th June 2003 charged with murder. They both pleaded not guilty. Hearing started Wambilyangah J. as then was on 1st October 2003. Two witnesses testified before the said Judge. The case was adjourned for further hearing on 27th October 2003. However by that date Wambilyangah J. had left service. On 27th November 2003 this court ordered the case to start De Novo. However this has not happened. Mr. Ondari for the two accused now applies to this court to declare the trial before Wambilyangah J a mistrial and acquit the accused persons. The State counsel opposed the application on the ground that the court has already ordered the case to start a fresh. There is no denying that a trial took place before Justice Wambilyangah. Two witnesses testified. Justice Wambilyangah is since retried and therefore cannot be recalled to finalise the hearing. The trial before him was therefore a mistrial. It does not matter that this court had ordered the case to start afresh. The case has not started yet. A mistrial is a mistrial. I therefore allow the application. I hereby declare the trial before Wambilyangah J a mistrial. The accused persons are hereby discharged. The State however is at liberty to prefer fresh charges against the accused if it so wishes. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE. 27/7/04 Dated and delivered on 27th July 2004. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.