REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 199 OF 2003 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF MOMBASA …………. APPELLANT - Versus STEPHEN KIUNGA t/a KANJALU BUILDING CONTRACTORS …………. RESPONDENT RULING Mr. Areba agrees that at the time of entry of judgment in the court below, the time for filing of the defence was not got up. It therefore follows that the judgment in the lower court was irregularly entered. For this reason I do not need to consider the requirements of Order 41 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Appeal has overwhelming chance of success. Failure to serve the memorandum of appearance of the plaintiff does take away the defendant’s right to file defence. I allow this application and order that the costs be in the appeal. DATED this 16th day of February 2004. D.K. Maraga Ag. JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.