Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

(appellate Side) v Mohamed Abbas Mohamed Hussein Somji…respondent

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA DISTRICT REGISTRY (APPELLATE SIDE) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2002 DHIRAJLAL DULLABHI LAXMICHAND……………..APPELLANT VERSUS MOHAMED ABBAS MOHAMED HUSSEIN SOMJI…RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of proceedings, orders/decrees of the Rent Restriction tribunal in Rent Assessment case No. 56 of 1996 made on 16th and 22nd August 2002 on the grounds that the present appellant has filed an appeal which would be made nugatory. The Tribunal sits in sessions all over the country and is said to becoming back to Mombasa for April session. An injunction is also sought to stop the Respondent from altering the terms of appellant’s tenancy until the appeal is heard. In opposition the Respondent has filed grounds that the application is incompetent and the same has been overtaken by events and it is duplex. And furthermore the stay was granted by consent of parties in the Tribunal which stay has now expired. I have considered the submissions of both parties. There is no dispute that the applicant has a right of appeal. If order for stay is not granted the applicant/appellant would immediately lose his protected status under the Rent Restriction Act. The Respondent (landlord) would not suffer prejudice as he is receiving the rent assessment by tribunal at Sh.3,370 per month. The proposal for a further increase of rent is subject to the arguments in appeal. There is no dispute on the payment of the rent ordered by Tribunal. The only stay that can be granted is the stay of further proceedings pending appeal and an injunction against the landlord restraining him from increasing rent pending the hearing of appeal. In the circumstances the application is allowed and orders granted under (ii) and (iii). Costs shall be in the cause. Dated this 19th day of January 2004. JOYCE KHAMINWA JUDGE 19/1/04 Khaminwa – J.

page 1 of 2

Esther Clerk. Mr. Kimani for Applicant. Respondent not present Date for today. However the date for ruling was fixed in court. He is aware. Mr. Kimani I wish to inform court that the appellant expired after we argued the appeal. Court: Ruling to be read now. The appellants appeal is subject to the provisions of Order 23 Civil Procedure as to substitution Ruling Read in open Court In the presence of : Mr. Kimani. JOYCE KHAMINWA JUDGE Dated this 19th day of January 2004.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.