Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2032 of 2004

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 163 OF 1996 R.D. 1.WAMWERE KYALO………………………………..1ST PLAINTIFF 2.WAMBUA KYALO…………………………………2ND PLAINTIFF =V E R S U S= 1.THOMAS MUTUKU KILONZO………………1ST DEFENDANT 2.MUTUKU KILONZO…………………………..2ND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT On 17/4/02 liability was apportioned by consent as follows:Plaintiff 35% Defendant 65%. When the matter came up for hearing on assessment of damages the Advocates offered submissions which were brief and to the point. For Plaintiff, one witness was called (his legal representative). The injuries led to amputation of left leg below the knee. The Plaintiff died on 17/7/96 about one year after accident in 1995. Plaintiff’s counsel proposed Kshs.800,000/- while the Defendants’ counsel proposed Kshs.600,000/-. Special Damages Kshs.4001/- was admitted by the Defendant. Upon perusing the record and seeing that the Plaintiff lived for about 12 months and was hospitalized for 40 days and he lived for that period without the left leg, I am of the view that a sum of Kshs.600,000/- for pain suffering and loss of amenities, plus Special Damages of Kshs.4001/= is adequate compensation. Judgment is therefore entered in the sum of Kshs.604,001/- with costs and interest. The amount of decree after apportionment shall be paid to the deceased Personal Representatives. Dated this 30th day of July, 2004. JOYCE KHAMINWA

page 1 of 2

JUDGE Mr. Pandya Mr. Mutubia – for Were Mr. Mutubia for Were – for Defendants I ask for stay for 45 days to pay. Mr. Pandya No objection. COURT Execution is stay for a period of 45 days from to-day after which Plaintiff shall be at liberty to execute. JOYCE KHAMINWA, J.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.