Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Timothy Wafula v Sietco Development Africa Limited

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CIVIL SUIT NO. 429 OF 1998 TIMOTHY WAFULA…………………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS SIETCO DEVELOPMENT AFRICA LIMITED…………….DEFENDANT JUDGMENT According to the plaintiff, on or about 11th May, 1995 as he was acting in the course of his employment with the defendant, when due to the negligence of the latter – and or that of the employees, while digging a foundation at a construction site, the wall of the foundation collapsed on him, causing him serious injuries and has suffered loss and damages. Due to the accident, the plaintiff became unconscious and only regained the same at Lugulu Mission Hospital where he had been admitted for 2 months. The plaintiff explained that due to the accident, he received the following injuries: - two broken ribs. - Chest injuries which led to two operations. - On the hand and shoulders. Consequently, the plaintiff underwent two medical examinations by Dr. Malik and Katam who later prepared – Ex.3 and Ex.5. Even by the time of the trial, the plaintiff was still complaining of feeling a lot of pain when walking long distances. He also complained of feeling headache whenever he was hungry. Earlier, the parties had entered a consent judgment on liability. The consent was entered on the following terms:

page 1 of 3

(i) That judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the plaintiff on liability at the ratio of 75:25. (ii) That costs of Kshs.42,400 in respect of Bungoma CMCC No. 566 of 1990 be deducted from the sum to be awarded as general damages in this instant suit. On completion of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant opted not to offer any evidence. Consequently, both Counsels handed in detailed submissions to guide the Court on the quantum of damages. Both of them also quoted several authorities to assist the Court. Having carefully perused the above, the Court is of the considered opinion that the injuries suffered by the plaintiff were serious and are in the same class as those suffered in the following cases: - SISCO Murunga Ndanya & 2 Others Vs Coast Bus Services Ltd. HCCC No. 4425 of 1990 (Nairobi) and In Mercy Richard Vs Raphael Mombasa HCCC No. 871 of 1982 Taking into account the rate of inflation and the passage of time since the other authorities were delivered, I hereby award Kshs.800,000 as general damages. The upshot is that I hereby enter final judgment on the following terms: (a) General damages: Kshs.800,000.00 Less 25% contribution Less Kshs.200,000.00 Kshs.42,000.00 Kshs.557,600.00 (b) Special damages – Kshs.2,000. (c) Costs of the suit. (d) Interest on (a), (b) and (c) at Court rates. MUGA APONDI

page 2 of 3

JUDGE Judgment read, signed and delivered in open Court in the presence of Mr. Odhiambo Advocate. MUGA APONDI JUDGE 17TH FEBRUARY, 2004

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.