Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1681 of 2004

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.271 OF 2001 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WINSTONE ONYANGO ORWENYO ………………………………………………………………… DECEASED BETWEEN MARTHA KEMUMA ONYANGO ……………………….. PETITIONER/APPLICANT MONICA KERUBO MOGIRE …………………………. OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT RULING: I have carefully considered the application and the objection thereto. I find the application is merited. There is no dispute that Teresa Nyabonyi Onyango is a daughter of the deceased WINSTONE ONYANGO ORWENYO. This is so shown in form P & A5 filled on 12/11/01. Further it is not denied by the Objector that she is now a student at Nyabururu Girls High School. The objector even entered a consent order last year for her school fees. What is now being applied for is for an order that fees be paid from the deceased’s account. I would not call that plundering the estate of the deceased. I believe even the objector would want to see the child finish her schooling. Schools have already opened and court was told the child has already been sent home. One therefore cannot say the application is premature or not urgent. The student cannot stay at home until directions are taken. The issue of the applicant swearing affidavit to show the inventory of the assets of the estate is not necessary as form P&A 5 was filled on 12/11/01 and it clearly shows the assets of the deceased. The net value is given at shs.2.5 million. The application prays for mere shs.45,000/=. One cannot say that that is providing for one heir at the expense of the other heirs. Counsel for objector told court that circumstances have changed since last year when they entered a consent to provide for the same dependants. I was not told how they have changed. I however feel that the only circumstances that have changed is that the dependant is joining form Two and not form one. All in all I find application is reasonable. The same allowed as prayed. Costs in the cause. KABURU BAUNI

page 1 of 2

JUDGE 9/2/04 Signed, dated and delivered on 9/2/04. Mr. Ondika holding brief for Mr. Oguttu for applicant. No appearance for the objector. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE 1/3/04 Bauni J Order: Application dated 26/2/04 certified urgent. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE 1/3/04 4/3/04 Bauni J CC – Obino Mr. Oguttu for applicant Mr. Oguttu: I am for applicant. Our application is for the court’s order issued on 9/2/04 to be changed to reduce the amount ordered of shs.45,000/= to shs.38,000/=. There is a supporting affidavit. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE Court: I have gone through the application. It’s reasonable and not prejudicial to the respondent. The application is allowed as prayed. The cheque of shs.38,000/= be made in the name of the school – NYABURURU GIRLS’ HIGH SCHOOL. KABURU BAUNI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.